Each time a major awards ceremony draws close, there’s always an outcry for introducing fresh award types to honor underappreciated efforts and delight the hearts of fans who have specialized interests.
A fellow writer has already made advocating for terror-themed awards. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, representing a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front because like all dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand stands as crucial above others. This is the request: It's essential to create a classification for brain-teasing titles.
Organizing Gaming Categories
Classifying creative works is not a science; opinions vary greatly, and typically generate discussions concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason movie academies avoid this approach. But it is an unavoidable compromise in the world of gaming, that demonstrate such variety they barely qualify as a single art form.
For comprehensive acknowledgment of gaming accomplishments to gain proper attention, and to ensure all game types to compete fairly, classification by type becomes crucial.
Current Gaming Award Categories
Leading game ceremonies presently include genre categories for Action, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these classifications successfully include numerous genres, and you can find room for numerous titles.
Not so for puzzle games. No appropriate category exists to put them. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, showing diverse approaches: building puzzles from a specific release, intense tile-matching in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. Where could they possibly go between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.
Recognition Challenges
Many instances occur outstanding logic titles launched regularly that have no home at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify for categories like Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, or the extremely competitive independent game categories.
- A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated completely in 2014
- A different innovative game missed out during that ceremony
- A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment recently
- Only a few logic titles barely qualified for independent or mobile categories
Importance of Logic Titles
These are often compact experiences, however the design behind logic titles is of massive significance. Well-known matching games rank among most engaged experiences in the world and have been for an extended period.
The famous puzzle experience competes with famous sandbox experiences competing to become most purchased experience; it also contends for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, and engaging with diverse game types.
Proposal and Rationale
Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter this problem. One could readily select five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games annually without trouble — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.
Restating the point, these include experiences lacking appropriate categories in important events. Puzzle game makers function at the demanding boundary game development, developing some of the purest expressions of gaming itself. Comparable to movie stunt professionals, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting decades.
